Thursday, November 28, 2019

Xenophobia in Homers Oddyssey free essay sample

The greatest example of xenophobia in this book is in lines 148-153 on page 172. â€Å"So Odysseus moved out†¦ about to mingle with all those lovely girls, naked now as he was, for the need drove him on, a terrible sight, all crusted, caked with brine0 they scattered in panic down the jutting beaches,† In this scene in the book, Odysseus is woken up by Nausicaa’s maids playing in the river. When he comes out of the bushes and the maids take sight of him, they are frightened and they run away from him. They do this most likely because he is a foreign stranger and they are unfamiliar with him. They are also frightened because Odysseus appears out of the bushed naked. This scene reflects xenophobia because Nausicaa’s maids have an irrational fear towards Odysseus, who is a stranger. Nausicaa is the only one who does not show xenophobia because instead of running away like her maids, she chooses to stay out and confront Odysseus. We will write a custom essay sample on Xenophobia in Homers Oddyssey or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This suggests to the readers that Nausicaa was raised to be a strong, fearless person. Although, Nausicaa’s quality proved to be a good one, in other cases it may not be. Had Nausicaa met someone other than Odysseus, the result may not have been the same. If the person she had met had ill intentions, Nausicaa could have ended up being harmed, which would have been wrong judgement on her part. For a reader, this might be an example of the â€Å"proper way† to act towards strangers. Becasue Nausicaa is a Princess, she shows an amount of authority, and also people might look up to her as always doing the right thing. If Nausicaa sets and example in this book people may begin to follow it.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Comparison and Contrast of essays

Comparison and Contrast of essays Sammy from John Updikes A and Sarty from William Faulkners Barn Burning are two classic examples of human beings putting their foot down and representing what is morally right. In A Sammy is a young boy who works at the register of a grocery store and his life changes the day three young ladies in bathing suits come into the store. It was his boss who went up to these young ladies and told them that they are breaking the stores unwritten dress code. This led Sammy to dramatically quit his job to protest the unfair treatment which was given to the young ladies. Sarty is a ten year old boy whose sense of right and wrong had been biased by his tyrannical father. His father commits unlawful acts which hurt the family as a whole and he takes a stand to stop this type of activity. He stops the unlawful act before it actually occurred for the sake of doing what is right and in the process realized he could not return to his family. A and Barn Burning are two great pieces of literature th at are similar in many ways, yet they are also different as well. There are many people in history that have taken a stand for what they believe in for the purpose of maintaining their dignity and self-respect and Sammy and Sarty are two classic examples of that. Sammy and Sarty are two young male characters that show signs of dissatisfaction with the authority figures in their lives and declare independence. When Sammys boss named Lengel confronts three young ladies and makes a public scene, Sammy couldnt help but be extremely observant. It was his observations, so marvelously acute and so precisely and delightfully expressed that made him unique (Dessner). It was then that he begins to notice that he strongly disagreed with the way that Lengel was treating the girls and scolding them for wearing their bathing suits. By Sammy saying the words...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Does Audit Regulation Ensure Auditor Independence Dissertation

Does Audit Regulation Ensure Auditor Independence - Dissertation Example Unlike the legal representatives, he is not projected to make out a case. The nature of the service he provides is impersonal (Sells, 1908). Near the beginning of 1928, a perspective in the Paper of Accountancy emphasized the subsistence of a clash of interest when an auditor is a stockowner, executive, or leader of the association. It declared: The accountant should be absolutely detached from financial or other contribution in the success or failure of an activity under audit that no one could ever point an indicting finger, however unfairly, and allege the likelihood of bias (Journal of Accountancy, 1928). Carey and Doherty (1966) arose with three different views of auditor independence: First, in the logic of not being subsidiary, it means candour, veracity, objectivity and dependability. Subsequent, in the constricted sense in which it is exercised in association with auditing and articulation of views on economic proclamations, independence means evasion of any affiliation that would be probably, even unintentionally, to spoil the chartered accountant's independence as reviewer. Last of all, it means evasion of associations that to a sensible onlooker would advise an argument of interest. The auditing line of work has come under regular analysis regarding the auditor's perceived objectivity: In 1970, Forbes brought out editorial inquiring auditor independence by hoisting the following: As auditors are chosen and remunerated by management, are they really independent (Forbes, 1970). In 1974, the Wall Street Journal issued one more editorial in which an investor condemned a $1.6 million lend by the bank to the firm's... This study looks into the importance of auditor independence was acknowledged by the UK in 1845. Most states have copied the UK track in entailing that independent auditors review economic reports. Most nations view auditor independence not just as an officially authorized precept but also an ethical affair to deem with. Most rules of moral code prescribe arguments of importance by not: allowing the auditor to work as director or member of staff of the firm audited; acting as a commercial trustee of the firm audited, admitting or warranting loans from or to an audit customer, having a straight or circuitous matter interest in the firm audited, imagining operating tasks, having family rapport with the audit customer, or being in positions in which auditor independence is deduced to be weakened. As the access to the UK into the European General Market (EEC) and the ratification of the Eighth Company Law Directive on auditor's credentials, the European nations are publicizing themselves with the American thought of auditor independence. Some opponents think, however, those cultural discrepancies among European nations make the perception of auditor independence a type of casement dressing. According to the research findings, this paper makes a conclusion that this may be the motive that directed the International Audit Committee of the International Federation of Accounting to permit the local governments' agreement with issues of auditor independence and other correlated issues.